Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
martin ↑
@martin
I would love feedback on a concept @six and I have been working on: Propstreams, an upgrade to the current Nouns streaming infrastructure. We're hoping this can be the next chapter of contributor payment infrastructure in Nouns and be part of an all-in-one hub with Propdates as well.
9 replies
1 recast
21 reactions
martin ↑
@martin
We've also got pseudocode for those that are curious - we're looking for more technical feedback on some design decisions.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Elad
@el4d
I'm not a fan of forcing updates If a recipient wants they can easily game it It feels too rigid and bureaucratic We mitigate risk by having shorter streams with new builders And we should nudge more towards streams It boils down to social layer IMO
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Neokry
@neokry
One thing that could be useful is to make it easier for people to cancel streams and quote an update as a reason. ie if someone posts a bad / blank update it should be easy for any holder to put up a cancel proposal with a description semi filled out already
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wiz
@wiz
i really like the idea of exponential streams! having a hard time thinking of a prop where i’d want to do that but it’s making my imagination run
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Davin クマ
@davinoyesigye
does this intergrate with propdates?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
david
@davidbr
there's a risk that adding friction to streams would actually discourage people from wanting to use them. I think we're still at the phase where we need to encourage proposers to use streams.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jesse Pollak 🔵
@jessepollak
absolutely love the idea of updates for streams. even if people do bad updates (or blank updates), that alone is a sign. in more centralized organizations, having some level of regular updates is a really powerful cultural tool for creating accountability. see this as a tool for doing that ina. more decentralized way.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
rafa
@rafa
I think introducing comments into the builder workflow is a great idea. When we think about the builder journey, a portal for stream claiming with propdate request makes intuitive sense to me. I do believe that people could ignore it, add noise — but that would come back to builder public reputation.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
It only makes sense if it's built in a way that cannot be manipulated; otherwise, it does not make sense because it does not bring any actual value.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
