Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
This would be a great reversion Right now, deciding to be a client (ie. an app that can write to hubs) requires not only betting on FC, but making users pay before they can use your app By getting rid of the latter, it reduces risk to just platform risk and likely will enable FC read-only apps to become clients more easily
3 replies
0 recast
32 reactions

Mark Fishman pfp
Mark Fishman
@markfishman
Can you eli5 for the less technical folks
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Every new app that wants to write data to a Farcaster hub needs a signer key that lets them sign messages on behalf of a user (otherwise you’d have to sign something every time you cast to prove it came from you) Previously, signers were registered in hubs, at zero cost to apps (or the respective user). Downside was some issues with the CRDT model — read more here: https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/103 As a result, signer registration had to be moved onchain, which has a gas cost to issue the transaction. Apps pass this cost down to users, which is not ideal Now, because hubs are moving away from CRDTs to the Snapchain design, the downsides around registering signers in hubs goes away (presumably due to ordering and merkelized state) This means we could move signers offchain again, making it free for users to use clients for the first time!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction