Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
This would be a great reversion Right now, deciding to be a client (ie. an app that can write to hubs) requires not only betting on FC, but making users pay before they can use your app By getting rid of the latter, it reduces risk to just platform risk and likely will enable FC read-only apps to become clients more easily
3 replies
0 recast
32 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
the onchain cost of adding a signer is basically negligible today so i don't think it will make a difference in that sense tbh (most apps are already subsidising this cost) the cost to onboard net new users is a much higher barrier for farcaster apps imo
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Mark Fishman pfp
Mark Fishman
@markfishman
Can you eli5 for the less technical folks
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Ξ2T 🏰 pfp
Ξ2T 🏰
@earth2travis
Every time I share what we are working on the first objection is platform risk
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction