Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
99% of users don't care about decentralization. Developers care about decentralization. Users want to be entertained or make money.
89 replies
69 recasts
342 reactions

𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑 pfp
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
imho, I'd push back and say that users don't care about decentralization 99% of the time. there's plenty of centralized platforms that have unambiguously failed to maintain ToS (or purged some subculture). the irony is that it's more likely the more superfluous the object.
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Eylon 💨 pfp
Eylon 💨
@eylon.eth
I'll push back on the push back here. I even said it to Vitalik in person. Back in those days of WoW warlocks were so OP the siphon life nerf wasn't enough they did a few consecutive nerfs and they were all justified. -Effy, Undead Mage, Midget Mafia.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑 pfp
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
okay, let's tug on that thread. why was the WoW team incapable of respectively buffing all other builds to the point that nerfing was unnecessary? https://x.com/m_j_rossman/status/1788193941583528324
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Eylon 💨 pfp
Eylon 💨
@eylon.eth
They did. They constantly buffed and nerfed classes, abilities, weapons, talents, and more
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑 pfp
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
it's still a half-measure to fall back on the third rail. obviously a nontrivial undertaking to only nerf by dilution, and WoW was captivating (among others), but my point is that the control of the game was so constrained that it could not possibly attain the largest economy w/ subculture retention.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction