The limiting factor for Farcaster’s growth is the supply of high-quality interesting / entertaining organic content.

Most people who are focused on creating content optimize for networks with large existing audiences because while hard to break through, the upside is massive.

Solve for X.

devil's advocate: since content creators already build distribution via patreon/linktree/sponsorship, just having any "pseuodopodia" on farcaster means growth. the "organic" factor is consequential but not necessary for initial growth, and one could even argue that getting the 90% lurkers from one site would induce >1 organic reply & new dialogue.

tbqh, there needs to be an ultra-sterile patronage client for traditional content creators.

I'm online sometimes

https://bento.me/m-j-r

🌶️- time spent is a potemkin KPI. 
growth = moar graph links, more transactions

we don't even need them to be here to start flirting with cultural phenomenon like responding to cross-site controversy. besides, there's a few content creators already, anyone further might change the nature of the game.

Revealed preference is without a large pool of new potential followers, creators won’t spend time here.