Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
22 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
The limiting factor for Farcasterβs growth is the supply of high-quality interesting / entertaining organic content. Most people who are focused on creating content optimize for networks with large existing audiences because while hard to break through, the upside is massive. Solve for X.
79 replies
51 recasts
351 reactions
π_π_π
@m-j-r.eth
devil's advocate: since content creators already build distribution via patreon/linktree/sponsorship, just having any "pseuodopodia" on farcaster means growth. the "organic" factor is consequential but not necessary for initial growth, and one could even argue that getting the 90% lurkers from one site would induce >1 organic reply & new dialogue. tbqh, there needs to be an ultra-sterile patronage client for traditional content creators.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Revealed preference is without a large pool of new potential followers, creators wonβt spend time here.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Sometimes it's only about an audience that cares. Not saying this in some romantic, idealistic way: I cast in /techarchive only because there are 20-50 regulars that relate to what I cast. I know I won't monetize the hour I spent today scanning an old magazine and browsing through 300 pages for interesting stuff. And the channel audience is small compared to the number of followers I already have. But it's rewarding enough to share my niche interest with an audience that relates.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
π_π_π
@m-j-r.eth
πΆοΈ- time spent is a potemkin KPI. growth = moar graph links, more transactions we don't even need them to be here to start flirting with cultural phenomenon like responding to cross-site controversy. besides, there's a few content creators already, anyone further might change the nature of the game.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
