Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
It is fascinating how lots of people seem to genuinely have the mental association "EAs = people who are anti-technology" Of course it makes sense if 2023 AI stuff is one's first introduction to internet nerd subcultures, but even two years ago that characterization would have seemed completely incomprehensible.
18 replies
24 recasts
235 reactions

Joe Blau ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Joe Blau ๐ŸŽฉ
@joeblau
I donโ€™t think EA is anti-tech. Itโ€™s just a wealth redistribution scheme where one group of people thinks they know how to best allocate resources by taking resources from other groups. You can do it with or without tech.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

GIGAMฮžSH pfp
GIGAMฮžSH
@gigamesh
All the discussion of wealth distribution Iโ€™ve heard from EA is about oneโ€™s personal wealth, but all the criticism Iโ€™ve heard of EA sounds like the reactionary โ€œtaxes = theftโ€ stuff that seems to show up whenever anyone talks about global risks. ๐Ÿ˜• (Note: both sides agree SBF was a criminal)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

m_j_r pfp
m_j_r
@m-j-r.eth
imho, the criticism might also be that beliefs of efficacy or altruism can be strong enough to bend or overstep what others consider to be personal boundaries. like spending personal wealth on prohibition lobbying for collective good is somehow both civically & epistemically sound.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

GIGAMฮžSH pfp
GIGAMฮžSH
@gigamesh
Yea that's fair. I guess EA hasn't been shy about using money to influence politics.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction