Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
It is fascinating how lots of people seem to genuinely have the mental association "EAs = people who are anti-technology" Of course it makes sense if 2023 AI stuff is one's first introduction to internet nerd subcultures, but even two years ago that characterization would have seemed completely incomprehensible.
18 replies
24 recasts
139 reactions

Joe Blau 🎩 pfp
Joe Blau 🎩
@joeblau
I don’t think EA is anti-tech. It’s just a wealth redistribution scheme where one group of people thinks they know how to best allocate resources by taking resources from other groups. You can do it with or without tech.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
All the discussion of wealth distribution I’ve heard from EA is about one’s personal wealth, but all the criticism I’ve heard of EA sounds like the reactionary “taxes = theft” stuff that seems to show up whenever anyone talks about global risks. 😕 (Note: both sides agree SBF was a criminal)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑 pfp
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
imho, the criticism might also be that beliefs of efficacy or altruism can be strong enough to bend or overstep what others consider to be personal boundaries. like spending personal wealth on prohibition lobbying for collective good is somehow both civically & epistemically sound.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Joe Blau 🎩 pfp
Joe Blau 🎩
@joeblau
The paradox is: What is personal wealth? If we don’t really make money, and all we do is take money from others, then richest people are simply the best at taking money from others. I’m not necessarily against this, but it’s just capitalism. (Agree on SBF.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction