Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jacopo.eth pfp
jacopo.eth
@jacopo.eth
stated: hide the bots revealed: where are the likes
3 replies
3 recasts
17 reactions

m_j_r pfp
m_j_r
@m-j-r.eth
imho selecting out speculative hubs/bots is longterm going to yield higher-signal engagement, which is underlying justification for that vanity metric. we shouldn't be settling for instagram-tier dilution & any compression/sequestration of noisy slop is going to pay off when everything heats up.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

jacopo.eth pfp
jacopo.eth
@jacopo.eth
if users see little to no reaction to their casts, why would they bother posting? is the illusion of fake engagement worse than the harsh reality of low high-quality content? are bots good or bad?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

m_j_r pfp
m_j_r
@m-j-r.eth
candidly, this is a natural reaction to the withdrawal of rewards. it is the short-term, seasonal attitude that will dissipate in other circumstances. perhaps fake engagement isn't as constrained a dilemma as perceived. for example, imagine merkle shipped a "I'm a bot/group" badge & there was an incentive for that. now engagement can be heated up, since it's more forthcoming to the other side of the market. meanwhile, users gain a bit of time to mark the sloppiest bots/scammers, before sybil/phishing becomes even more lucrative. but the illusion has a immersion-breaking cost.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction