Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
ironically leaving farcon more bearish on farcaster. the protocol wants to compete and win at the client level. clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol. all roads lead to winner take all. what’s the point?
36 replies
3 recasts
93 reactions
LGHT
@lght.eth
v interesting - unsolicited thoughts spurred by your cast: client diversity (beyond remaking twitter/reddit) is prolly the way to more +sum 'competition' not entirely sure what that looks like yet, but further raises my intuition that a fc client may be 'best' used for just porting networks into niche products
2 replies
1 recast
14 reactions
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
this ecosystem is utopia if you accept you’re only building niche products for niche audiences. that’s the source of diversity. and then you realize that most of these niche products make for great features that can be replicated in the dominant social product.
3 replies
0 recast
12 reactions
Lior
@lior
The app (code) is forekable but the community of users isn't. Clients built around networks, with shared mission and needs will be the way to get 1000's of clients for niche
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
when a client becomes more successful than warpcast which community will they choose?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Lior
@lior
I mean the opposite - networks (/higher /gloomtoken /nouns build clients that fit their needs + share the value created back to that community treasury.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
