Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
ironically leaving farcon more bearish on farcaster. the protocol wants to compete and win at the client level. clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol. all roads lead to winner take all. what’s the point?
36 replies
3 recasts
93 reactions

LGHT pfp
LGHT
@lght.eth
v interesting - unsolicited thoughts spurred by your cast: client diversity (beyond remaking twitter/reddit) is prolly the way to more +sum 'competition' not entirely sure what that looks like yet, but further raises my intuition that a fc client may be 'best' used for just porting networks into niche products
2 replies
1 recast
14 reactions

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
this ecosystem is utopia if you accept you’re only building niche products for niche audiences. that’s the source of diversity. and then you realize that most of these niche products make for great features that can be replicated in the dominant social product.
3 replies
0 recast
12 reactions

matt  ↑ ᖽ pfp
matt ↑ ᖽ
@blueish
agree with @lght.eth - differentiated viable clients is the goal. Without it there’s not much point to all of this. @0xdesigner I actually think the protocol would welcome it, even if they are winning at the client level rn https://warpcast.com/blueish/0xab7b2880
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions