0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
7 replies
1 recast
17 reactions
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
it's so much dumber than this
there are actually 3 groups being talked about here - rich, poor, and food stamp recipients
OP explicitly complains that there's someone out there who has "cut back on junk food" (the middle group here) bc they like it but they cannot afford it, and they are subsidizing the recipients
i agree that soda is bad, i think it should be taxed heavily, moreso than alcohol or cigarettes (which can actually be defended as real lifestyle choices), soda and hfcs should be out of reach for most people
but Matt Walsh is just mad that freeloaders are taking the sweet sweet corn nectar from a taxpaying american, Matt Walsh wants everyone drinking soda except for people who he deems unworthy, Matt Walsh thinks soda is a special treat for people who work hard enough and everyone else gets plain white walls, saltine crackers, and a life of zero flavors 0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
