i made a kinda dumb cast month or so ago that i didn’t respect anon accounts that have nothing to lose so they attack people. 

i should’ve been more nuanced. 

i think pseudonymous accounts like roon, daniel, formerly beff jezos are essential to growing a social platform — and farcaster needs them. are any here?

cto @ bwl.gg (lunchbreak.com), 80M+ users (bdut.ch) 🙏 built @remindme, @mintit, @gpt, @healthbot, farcantasy.xyz

maxxing on /morpho 🦋 | pursuing a higher self w /higher-athletics | consistently curious

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

I wish I could go anon but keep my followers. Even an approx signal (a zk badge that this anon account have X000 followers on main) would go a long way

@kugusha.eth @warpcastadmin.eth what would fc need to do this in-protocol?

Foster open dialogues on Farcaster | Zk prove your fid & cast privately | Cast: https://33bits.xyz

building /cabin, advising /clanker and /farcon | grin.io

«Opportunity for a client». This is a long term idea for @33bits 
 
Anon/pseudoanon with zk proved reputation defined as traits (N followers, NFTs, proof of onchain activity). First step would be to have dynamically updated groups of these traits. I believe @lsankar.eth is doing smth in that direction too

Full-time builder. @pimlico | @33bits | @66bits | farcaster-solidity | x.com/potekhin_sergey. Zero-knowledge and asynchronous transactions evangelist.

Working on building zkTLS infra/products. A ruthless empiricist and meme connoisseur.

http://opacity.network

also cc @eulerlagrange.eth and @fastfourier.eth

Trustless ZKP for followers will be difficult because follow messages are stored in the hub crdt. Inefficient to work on that structured.

I’d start with a trusted party index fid->followers, and do a membership proof in that structure.

Long term some kind of recursive zkVM proof from crdt msgs would be best bet.