July
@july
I'm interested in a planetary level -- shared, immutable layer of truth that even AGI/ASI will have to acknowledge because: How else are we going to monitor and holding both ourselves and our continued advanced intelligences to be accountable to our own human-defined, and eventual machine standards of truth and ethics?
7 replies
12 recasts
50 reactions
July
@july
And "truth" in this case, I imagine a sort of "Popperian Truth" -- where 'truths' can only be tested and potentially falsified. Truth, in this sense, is provisional and contingent on surviving attempts at falsification. And as I think of a verified truth layer, as an for an objective adjudicator to exist. Provide a shared reality layer where individual claims can be verified or falsified -- meaning you don't proclaim that there is an ultimate arbiter of abstract "Truth" with a capital T. Rather, it’s like a ref that referees sports, or something or rather
1 reply
2 recasts
16 reactions
Jason
@jachian
I know I’ve been a consultant too long when I read that and imagined Benioff whispering “single source of truth” in my ear
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
🎥🌳
@tcw
With you on this July. Culture will lead the way; universals truths are important, but there is no better illumination of the unknown than good story
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
The Wizard
@queue
✨ planet-wide-shared-immutable-truth ✨ Count me in.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cyrus
@cyrus
Me too. Maybe not in exactly the same way, but the notion of plantery scale computing has really caught my imagination after I met Prof Gallisson and learned more about this: https://eventhorizontelescope.org/science
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩ ツ
@kmacb.eth
will donate publicproof.org to the cause! Keep going! We need this in the universe.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
/disclosure
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction