Content
@
0 reply
27 recasts
29 reactions
Jesse Pollak ๐ต
@jessepollak
I wrote a long tweet about how I think about games + scaling on @base TL;DR build on @base L2 for casual games with "inapp purchases", build on a @base L3 for scaled, dedicated compute that is still deeply connected to the onchain economy. https://x.com/jessepollak/status/1770846472470143439?s=46
10 replies
21 recasts
166 reactions
Lindo
@lindo
@jessepollak double-clicking on Base L3s. Polygon has SuperNets, which allow you to have an own token for gas but are closed-end. Have considered building on this because of how cheap it would be to maintain and for txs, but hate that it isn't permissionless. What do y'all have in mind for L3s?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Samuel
@samuellhuber
how do you feel on security assumptions from L3 -> L2 -> L1 we're not there yet that it's all trustless so I assume you'd need to trust the custom L3, then Base to stay neutral + decentralized and the L1 with potential bridges in between if you need to use them? base settles into L1 blobs, L3 into L2 base blobs?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ronan
@ronan.eth
Agreed, I am bullish on low throughput fully onchain games This is a new avenue for game design too and it works well in the harsh environment that blockchain is. it force the game to be more human and can be less vulnerable to bots My latest is 1tx / day https://twitter.com/stratagems_eth/status/1770684846186070062
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
Marissa
@marissaposner
Bullish on base gaming โก๏ธ Base for web 2.5 games that have some onchain activity and L3s for fully onchain games
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Bookmarked (and not by accident)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Fookinnowan ๐ฉ๐ต
@fookinnowan
@frenpet Let's go to L3
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
๐ benna ๐๐ฉ
@benna
tagging @greekdx - since you were looking for some pointers on integrating @couch-heroes with Base!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
