Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Alemac pfp
Alemac
@alemac
Farcaster new fid register is now <500 per day. What are we doing wrong?
28 replies
12 recasts
82 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Not enough interesting content
61 replies
0 recast
85 reactions

Joelle LB  pfp
Joelle LB
@joellelb
I think the issue is more to do with the low engagement rate / reach when ppl do share interesting content for their community. that and the fact that its much harder to grow on here vs other platforms. (I love fc btw, just some feedback Ive heard a lot)
2 replies
0 recast
17 reactions

Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus
I have the same experience on most other platforms tho. If I share something I find interesting on X, I get no engagement. Because I haven’t spent time building an audience there. Same with IG, etc. Anywhere you go, you will get poor engagement until you spend time building an audience.
1 reply
1 recast
8 reactions

Joelle LB  pfp
Joelle LB
@joellelb
Ah. That sucks. Might be different if all you share is art, i get really good engagement on FB and it was much easier to grow a new account on IG, FB & Twitter for me.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
discovery/optimization problem
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Joelle LB  pfp
Joelle LB
@joellelb
I wish the suggested follows showed accounts I'm truly interested in. I see little to no artists in there rn tho. Not sure what the solution is.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jason🎩 pfp
Jason🎩
@jasonophoto
Perhaps it is because art isn't being recognized and valued by the platform? It doesn't show in trending, and it doesn't show as suggested follows for new followers, so we're left relying on each other to find the new artists here? As for building an audience, I've been her since February, posting multiple times daily, and crossposting to various channels (which isn't possible on other platforms), yet my average reactions per cast is (I think) roughly 22. I get that the entire audience on Farcaster is smaller, but that's not a great result when I share an image that got 65k reactions on Facebook, for instance.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus
On Fc, you have to spend more time building an audience and a network. You can’t just share something and expect good distribution here. You have to spend the time creating an audience.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Joelle LB  pfp
Joelle LB
@joellelb
While I agree its important to invest time to build an audience, its really not helping a new platform onboard new users if the algorithm prevents organic reach / growth & account discovery in the initial years of its launch. Especially for artists who already have to spend an enormous amount of time marketing themselves on 3-4 other platforms. Most people I see having a lot of success on FC spend 4-8 hours day on the app. How are artists supposed to find time to create if 1/3 of their day is dedicated to growing their FC audience? Its never gonna happen they’re just gonna leave and focus on platforms where their content is seen more easily. The amount of time I’ve had to spend on here to grow my account was probably 4-5x more than IG, FB & X. Def a big issue to address as it will keep preventing mass onboarding imo.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Jason🎩 pfp
Jason🎩
@jasonophoto
So, just for comparison, I jumped into the trending and find a piece of art there: 130 likes, and an account with 380,000 followers… for context, averaging 20-25 engagements with 4000 followers feels much stronger. It’s a question of the number of daily active users, and that requires more people participating. So this platform Is still so early… it’s not about building an audience here, but truly building the number of users actively engaged with this platform.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Jason🎩 pfp
Jason🎩
@jasonophoto
The trending cast I was referencing: https://warpcast.com/linda/0x5b711a5b
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction