Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
In hindsight the warpcast autofollow list was actually a social capital incentive that effectively turned power users into advocates for the protocol The users on the auto follow list had an incentive to grow the protocol because social capital accrued to them Kinda similar to a token in that sense
10 replies
2 recasts
42 reactions
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Didn’t really feel like a big win. I ended up on that list, and now I’ve got a bunch of bots and inactive accounts following me. Wish there was a way to clear out dormant followers
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
a prune would be interesting
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
a tool that would SHOW you that, even if it didnt let you do the actual pruning, would be valuable
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
simple stat YOUR FOLLOWER ESTIMATES 10% humans 90% bots based on xyz criteria sub-segment further as desired
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
alex
@alexgrover.eth
@proxystudio.eth had a dune that did this at some point. My estimate was like 8% real followers lol
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
yeah – do you remember they did a purge at one point? i remember losing like some large amount of followers there is a funny ... trust inversion thing w the follower number
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
I wonder if there’s a way to do a purge before moving to Snapchain. But looks like it’s up to each client to figure out how to handle this. I could see a future where a client filters out everyone except those with some kind of zk web proof
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
