so i am just about done with something longform about tpot happenings, but wanted to pull out at part of it relevant to network states

it seems like network states haven't really addressed safety especially wrt sexual violence, and i think a lot of ppl / women will be hesitant to jump in until they do

'villainess' doesn't do justice to my complexity, and only reveals your simplicity 

you can read the whole thing in farcasther later today if you want to but these two paragraphs are really what's relevant here

normie ire towards crypto/in some cases @balajis.eth, who is the face of the NS movement is high enough that i think NS's have to be exceptionally careful about their image with host countries

Humanist, lovepunk, engineer, experience producer, musician, angel. DAOs since ‘16. Experimenting with human protocols, trust networks & decentralized societies

i am always happy with raves proliferate but your code of conduct is not much better than 'be excellent to each other'

The Blockravers have. But we are not a network state or neither aspire to be one. We are a human network that creates pop-up raves, experiences and Coliving around major crypto and art events in the whole planet🫶🏽

fractalist. tech lead at cabin.city. founder of LBRY.com, Odysee.com, vibe.camp, @farcon, grin.io

it's maybe helpful to imagine the worst case scenario (i use prospera just b/c i think it's a well known one not saying anything about their ethics)

prospera has enough incidents happen that a consensus emerges it's friendly to sex pests and predators amongst a large enough # of ppl that they lobby the host country

so i mean much like an event / event org it is in a NS's best interest to do enough to at least have plausible deniability that they are intentionally creating a bad environment

It’s true — I haven’t seen much innovation on this. Vibecamp is def thinking about it.

That said, is this the kind of thing network states need to uniquely address vs adopting existing norms or letting society at large address it?