Thoughts on decentralized identity x farcaster x web3 social. https://i.imgur.com/YxJJ8H1.jpg

🎙️ /farsidefm | 🎨 /enlightendarts | agent @callusfbi

Web Tinkerer. DWeb. Open Source. Community. Just another one of the bees 🐝

Yea realized some of the words I either misunderstood or haven’t interpreted peoples, need to be more fleshed out. My main point was web3 social protocols should be able to talk to each other.

Integration is not quite the same thing as interop. What might Farcaster “consume” and interop with? Unclear!

cma.xyz. Founder /paragraph, ceo /mirror, previously at Google & Coinbase 

Agree with your point, there’s some sort of reputation that’s integrated as a start. Definitely see this improving with more in depth reputation mechanisms over time.

FC identity relies on wallet address though, so a user joining FC from scratch wouldn't necessarily be starting from ground zero for identity - their NFTs would be here, ENS, etc.

Re: interoperability, I completely agree, but that's up to developers (and not necessarily the FC core team) to build :)

Sorry for taking a while to get arnd to this.  Really enjoyed this!

Our vision with Chainstory is to make it a permissionless reputation primitive to help with the problem you outline.

web3 social all-in-one. 
crosspost to Farcaster, Twitter, Lens and Bluesky | yup.io | iOS: https://t.co/gJH0Bi07r4 | Android: https://bit.ly/3uaTz4T

Thanks for sharing.

1. Farcaster will soon be permissionless, so if integrating with X is what the market wants, someone will build it. Check out @yup’s new mobile app as an example 

2. Besides government IDs, all other popular identity systems are emergent from something you use a lot

This sentence really stood out to me: “Current protocols are a bit selfish, protocols don't talk to each other.”