Last week we noticed an influx of users all voting for the same answer repeatedly, leading to statistically impossible outcomes (e.g., 100% accuracy over 30 votes). 

So today we launched CollusionGuard 9000 🛡️ 

It uses ML to identify statistically anomalous clusters and adjust vote weights accordingly. For example, if you voted alongside 50 other people on all of the right answers for ten questions, your vote diminishes in value until your responses normalize.

People who fall into those clusters can still participate in boosted pools and win an equal amount by selecting the right answer. No banning required (for now). 

There’s risk in this approach. We expect a drop off in numbers from colluders - and some won’t consider this decentralized - but the overall integrity of the game should increase.

If you colluded on Ponder to earn $3.74 you're a fucking loser

building full stack onchain apps. making code go brrr. Building puzzlebets.xyz

They need to hire a Loser Defense Mechanism Designer

aspiring person // DC me if you need help making frames

I saw people do much worse on @jc4p’s game MVPs. It kind of blackpilled me on a certain type of Farcaster dev. The audience here isn’t even that big but very interested in exploits

Or you just may be in a place where that's better than the average hourly wage