Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
FC Top 30 Active Users (March vs April) I don't enjoy saying this, but there's a significant amount of spam and bots inflating the protocol stats. Don't take my word for it, examine the data. Perhaps we should start saying active "accounts" rather than "users."
9 replies
2 recasts
6 reactions
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
In March, the top 30 active users collectively made a total of 1,109,529 casts. In April, that number increased to 1,659,105.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Correction: this is the top 29 users 😂 but you get the point
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
As long as we create mechanisms that help users find the content they want to find, the bots doesn’t matter
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
I like the accounts / users distinction Farcaster is a protocol, as long as its rules are followed it intentionally makes no distinction users are a subjective subset of this that might map to unique human beings or unique human beings who’s content I don’t think is spammy or some other definition
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
rish
@rish
raw activity counts will always be higher for bots, that’s kind of the point of permissions protocols (and some bots can actually be useful). It’s the same on HTTP and SMTP If measuring just absolute activity, “accounts” is the right way to think about it
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dawufi
@dawufi
Dang, gotta get my numbers up
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Geoff Golberg
@geoffgolberg
According to @dwr.eth.. accounts and users are synonymous!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex A.🦊🎩
@whatsgood-al
Yeezusssss thats a huge number for the month of April, wow!!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sui
@sui
Open Korean channels you will understand from where spams coming.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
