Warpcast

Confirmation from Polygon CEO, @0xmarcb, that @polygon-protocol is indeed an impostor account cc: @dwr.eth https://warpcast.com/0xmarcb/0x668f746c https://warpcast.com/geoffgolberg/0xa9bb397a

I think we need some sort of verification system for project/company accounts on Warpcast

The blue checkmark on Twitter was a good signal but the process to get one was not clear or transparent at all.

PB is a signal that’s based on activity. There should also be a signal that’s based on verification.

Stay Curious // iixii // Lazer Technologies // Prev: CoinDesk, Roc Nation // based

😂 don’t worry about him he’s just random error

Good question. I think there should be a form or process that collects as much information as possible that could be independently verified.

The review / approval process would probably have to be somewhat of a manual process but i think that’d be a worthwhile investment for the Merkle team

What would be the best method for doing verification?

Sounds like an opportunity for channel.fun @matthew

design @splits | /wireframe /latenightcrew /event-pass /feud

I think the PB, or some form of it, will be back after this test.

This is a really great point. Would also make it less of a barrier for them to enter the community, which would be advantageous since many come with their own following.

Ha! Saw that account and knew right away it was not legit

This seems like the sort of job that requires a lot of human hours.  How would you stream line it? Wallet sigs? 

Verified builder/dev accounts
Verified intern accounts

As a paid for feature?

Do they get the same "mark" ?