Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/brypto
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Update on the Bybit hack. It looks like SAFE was compromised in the ByBit hack rather than Bybit being compromised "Safe smart contracts unaffected, an attack was conducted by compromising a Safe {Wallet} developer machine which affected an account operated by Bybit" https://x.com/benbybit/status/1894768736084885929/photo/2 https://x.com/safe/status/1894768522720350673
11 replies
12 recasts
48 reactions
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
More context: https://x.com/pcaversaccio/status/1894773709996724403?s=46&t=LNZpH03544B952EdXOUs2w
1 reply
2 recasts
14 reactions
kugusha 🦋 pfp
kugusha 🦋
@kugusha.eth
this actually makes me very worried
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
pxaxm pfp
pxaxm
@pxaxm
wonder if it was in a library dependency
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Colin pfp
Colin
@colin
You’re tellin me safe wasn’t very safe after all eh
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Kyle Tut pfp
Kyle Tut
@kyletut
IPFS CIDs + onchain signatures = safety Need verification of the frontend code through CIDs anchored to the specific address. You can see what that looks like here: https://ipcm.eth.limo
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Vinay Vasanji pfp
Vinay Vasanji
@vinayvasanji.eth
eli5?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Aydin pfp
Aydin
@aydin96
Wow
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tek pfp
Tek
@thetek.eth
This is really disappointing
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
accountless.eth pfp
accountless.eth
@accountless.eth
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
anthony pfp
anthony
@fascinated
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Stuart pfp
Stuart
@olystuart
Ouch. They say they've eliminated the attack vector but I'm not so sure there won't be some big ripple effects through the industry. 🤔 If nothing else breaks this could end up a good thing with a lot of core infra strengthened, but if there's more successful attacks in the meantime it could be very rough for a while.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction