Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

welter pfp
welter
@fun
noob question, how should i be setting up my next.js directory when i get to this part? does it matter? tagging ppl for help @greg @pixel @matthew @stephancill
11 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Greg pfp
Greg
@greg
Itโ€™s personal preference but I go yes yes no yes no (should probs be yes) no
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
eh I wouldn't use tailwind
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

vincent pfp
vincent
@pixel
Not an expert on Next.js, Greg uses it a lot :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Uncle Davo pfp
Uncle Davo
@uncledavo
diving into next.js soon too! will join u w the noob questions ๐Ÿซก
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

pugson pfp
pugson
@pugson
donโ€™t use eslint
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Brian Kim pfp
Brian Kim
@brianjckim
i use the same as above except i add import aliases
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

matthias pfp
matthias
@iammatthias
yes yes no yes yes no
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

timdaub pfp
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
me: - ts? no - eslint: no - tailwind: no - wtf does that mean? - router: no - wtf does that mean
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dinislam pfp
dinislam
@dinislam.eth
my complaints for app directory: - no way to return non-200 responses in server components - cookies are some times read only (i forget if thatโ€™s in server components or routes) - no good CSP solution that Iโ€™ve seen Iโ€™m coming straight from CRA, never used Pages router
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Brent Fitzgerald pfp
Brent Fitzgerald
@bf
> does it matter? recommend avoiding this question when developing because it leads right into a nihilism abyss.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

one of the many matts pfp
one of the many matts
@1ofthemanymatts
defaults are the move. if you don't like tailwind at first try using shadcn/ui's patterns and see if you still hate it. don't listen to the devils on your shoulders telling you to remove eslint, if anything add more eslint rules (like package sorting) and also prettier plugin. then never manually format code again
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction