Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
welter
@fun
š goodbye Active Badge š hello Reputation new component on FarcasterUserStats.com that accurately assesses if a you should trust a user or not ā this is based on follows from 60 reputable native Farcaster users that have high reputation
54 replies
23 recasts
119 reactions
christin
@christin
I did a sampling of folks, and it seems the data is quite extreme, folks are either 100% "excellent" or 0.XX% "poor"..and also, of those who are "poor" in this metric, I would feel a bit hurt to receive such a ranking since it is dependent on friendship with OG users, rather than reflective of quality of contributions.
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
christin
@christin
I commend your build speed as usual, just want to point out that the language of "excellent" and "poor" may not be reflect the data presented here, which is more about connection with a selected list of users who were on the platform earlier. And I'm speaking as someone who is 100%/excellent by your calculations š
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
welter
@fun
yeah i agree! need better language, grading a user is weird too but i think relationships are a good indicator for trust spending more time a user posts quality casts on farcaster, it translates into trust from more people
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kristin Piljay
@kristinpiljay
Yeah, I was rated as poor (2%) but I have all green checks except I don't have 400 followers yet. Maybe use another word for poor. Like developing or newby or novice or something like that. Someone who is still building their community here.... I tend to socialize with a group of artists, so I am not followed by
1 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
christin
@christin
thank you for considering my input!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
