Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
With coinbase and lens rolling out @xmtp messaging, it would be really amazing for @farcaster to embrace as well — unification of ethereum! Message anyone from/to ENS <> CB.ID <> Farcaster <> Lens <> 0x <> ENS <> CB.ID <> Farcaster <> Lens <> 0x
3 replies
7 recasts
42 reactions
Shane Mac
@shanemac.eth
We’d love to. More wallets to come. Be great to have this community as part of the network and working with us on security and roadmap. Doors been open…
1 reply
1 recast
11 reactions
Varun Srinivasan
@v
We're big fans of using open protocols too, but the concern was the way encryption was being done (fixed encryption key from ecdsa sig). It was easy to trick someone into signing a wallet message which would decrypt their entire history. I know y'all were working on improving the system, has that changed since?
2 replies
2 recasts
6 reactions
bitsikka
@bitsikka.eth
tbh, considering the potential scale Farcaster and Lens have, for maximum flexibility, seems they could operate at the same level as xmtp by using Waku directly, defining tailor made protobuf on top. https://twitter.com/oskarth/status/1679333922596077569
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Daniel Fernandes
@dfern.eth
I'm slowly working on a Farcaster Hubble integration with Waku...no timeline but 👀
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Fryorcraken
@fryorcraken.eth
What kind of integration? Do I remember correctly that @farcaster allows user to select the location for their messages to be stored? Such location could be Waku. Is that the integrated you're looking at?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
bitsikka
@bitsikka.eth
My guess, as far as FC is concerned, is no. FC already has hubs for storing messages. That trajectory is already set, sort of, in stone. Although perhaps the storage is interchangeable in the protocol by clients other than warpcast. The issue being discussed seems to be about DMs, or in FC speak Direct Casts.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
