Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
krel
@krel
Struggling to make sense of the vote outcome for 'fork at 10% threshold' prop. Shortcutting to my conclusion here but it seems that logically one person (or a consortium) holds an awful lot of nouns, ballpark of 300. And that person is not (primarily) motivated to arb. Other possibilities?
4 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
3 forks worth of 100% arbers has led to collective amnesia about minority protection
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
in b4 zebra tells me he wasn't an arber
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions