Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

Struggling to make sense of the vote outcome for 'fork at 10% threshold' prop.

Shortcutting to my conclusion here but it seems that logically one person (or a consortium) holds an awful lot of nouns, ballpark of 300. And that person is not (primarily) motivated to arb.

Other possibilities?

Almost no wallets without names voted for. Very surprised. Maybe a combination of inattention for individuals + complexities in governance participation for institutions

somewhat likely conclusion that:
- the person cares more about nouns than the money
- its peanuts anyway (eth wealthy)

Perhaps incentives from potential tax offsets via DUNA are larger than those from exit, and this allows them to keep the Nouns.

Whoever is holding these Nouns has certainly lost a lot of $.

Crypto, nouns, malleable software, interfaces, running. // working on @agora // https://0xmcg.com // /the-pond

the first fork importantly pressure released a bunch of disgruntled nouners and imo saved the project from certain death -- the following 2 pure arb

3 forks worth of 100% arbers has led to collective amnesia about minority protection