Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

Struggling to make sense of the vote outcome for 'fork at 10% threshold' prop.

Shortcutting to my conclusion here but it seems that logically one person (or a consortium) holds an awful lot of nouns, ballpark of 300. And that person is not (primarily) motivated to arb.

Other possibilities?

3 forks worth of 100% arbers has led to collective amnesia about minority protection

Crypto, nouns, malleable software, interfaces, running. // working on @agora // https://0xmcg.com // /the-pond

the first fork importantly pressure released a bunch of disgruntled nouners and imo saved the project from certain death -- the following 2 pure arb

what happened with the first fork, did anyone actually stick around to see through real minority protection or did everyone just rq

they tried to muster something but quickly lost momentum

but that doesnt really matter tho, whats more important is theyre not here anymore

I think it does matter though because fork -> rq, even if not an "arb" still feels like a refund, which doesn't feel like minority protection. So it's another fork that wasn't _really_ for minority protection

I agree, but I think seeing three forks that have had no meaningful minority protection has led people into thinking minority protection does not exist or is impossible, which is why I think this prop failed. Lots of VWR with basically no respect for minority protection

for me its 2 sides of the same coin

if im the majority, i want the pressure release feature
if im the minority, i want the protection