On a serious note I do think mini apps will eventually have to be rebranded to a better (ideally monosyllabic) name

"mini" feels like it undersells them tbh since they're actually fully-functioning web apps with onchain superpowers

/new-york by day 🗽 /untzuntz by night 😈 Fan of eating tacos and bringing people together, often at the same time 🌮

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

Nothing, not a priority, I just think "mini" app undersells them when they're really more like "super" apps (doesn't really matter and I understand why you guys chose to go with mini apps)

Let's 100x DAU before we worry about it :)

one problem is that it's hard to own the branding of "mini-app" since it's so generic. It felt like farcaster could have "owned" frames as a term, whereas mini-app is already co-opted by any of the social apps that offer something similar (telegram, world, the apps from Asia that I'm not super familiar with)

working on ambush and /noms :: nouns stan

The name change was driven by developers being confused about "frames" and then when we explained "oh, so a mini app".

Apple and Google both use "apps".

Win on the usage / distribution / functionality, not the name.

I’m hoping this works out for crypto mini apps to be write once deploy across Farcaster, worldcoin, etc.