Zinger ↑
@zinger
On a serious note I do think mini apps will eventually have to be rebranded to a better (ideally monosyllabic) name "mini" feels like it undersells them tbh since they're actually fully-functioning web apps with onchain superpowers
11 replies
0 recast
24 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
what does that solve?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zinger ↑
@zinger
Nothing, not a priority, I just think "mini" app undersells them when they're really more like "super" apps (doesn't really matter and I understand why you guys chose to go with mini apps)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Let's 100x DAU before we worry about it :)
4 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Michael Gingras 𓆏 (lilfrog)
@frog
one problem is that it's hard to own the branding of "mini-app" since it's so generic. It felt like farcaster could have "owned" frames as a term, whereas mini-app is already co-opted by any of the social apps that offer something similar (telegram, world, the apps from Asia that I'm not super familiar with)
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨
@joshuafisher.eth
I feel you, maybe my algo but see a few people saying stuff like this and watching you defend it…has anyone been standing up and saying “I love calling them miniapp” …I don’t have the hard data in front of me but words and names can be really powerful and the right ones can help get that 100x you’re looking for imho…not dying on this hill, just food for thought here…would Apps on phones took off if they call “phone programs”?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Zinger ↑
@zinger
🤝🏻
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mike Three
@mikethree
you could just call them apps, warpcaster apps
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
