Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Benjamin ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
I think Nouns’ media production investments/grants surpassed the threshold where now it’s time to normalize independent audits for media channels in a similar capacity critical code is audited.
5 replies
0 recast
13 reactions

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
We audit code but never audit the impact of code eg was it worth the funding. We have more tech debt than media debt. At least with media, even if we don’t see immediate impact there’s content that still lives & can be repurposed. With tech that’s no longer being used, most is just waste.
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

Benjamin ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
auditing code and auditing software are two separate audits. tbf most of the content that’s being produced with large budget can’t be repurposed.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
100% agree it’s way easier to reuse code than media
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
Except most won’t get reused because it’s made for nouns and just we just discard it. So much of that.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Benjamin ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
Yes and no - my argument for the media recyclability is that the media that’s getting the most eyeballs, mostly isn’t released with the required licensing.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction