Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
any justification from the team here? I can only speak for myself but I deliberately spent time thinking and interacting with protocol channel because there was such a strong reward. It feels like a horrible precedent to set that you can change the rewards after the round ends.
4 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

Bixbite πŸ‘½  pfp
Bixbite πŸ‘½
@bixbite
I’m honestly just shocked that a team with a $1M salary rugs on 1ETH πŸ˜†
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

krel pfp
krel
@krel
agree w this
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
agree/ have been personally thrilled with the level of conversation in here tbh. Maybe seems small in terms of #of posts and likes but personal sense is a well-articulated thought in here has a lot of value. obviously the potential impact of protocol design choices is unbounded . In any case y rugging not good..I figured goal was dao signals it as a priority and not to necessarily get a good return
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

datadanne pfp
datadanne
@datadanne.eth
yea same here, I spent a lot of time reading through the code changes & blog posts to be able to participate meaningfully
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction