Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
I still need to digest the governor changes but would it be possible to keep a snapshot/checkpoint of the voting power but then also have NDTs to allow for all of the positives they provide? This way you couldn't rotate through the pool because you'd have reached your voting power cp
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

david pfp
david
@davidbr
let us know if you think of a way once you digest it more
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
1/2 baked but what if state is kept every time you mint an NDT and when you try to vote or propose that state is checked to make sure the noun is still held by the person that administered the NDT. If it is, vote/prop goes through. Else NDT is burned. Prevents minting yourself dozens of NDTs then returning noun?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
I don't think stale tokens would be possible anymore (the transfer would void the state) but seems okay, seemed uncertain if stale NDTs should exist anyways
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

david pfp
david
@davidbr
is this assuming not using any checkpoints at all? I think one can still use their Noun to vote, then swap for a new Noun, mint an NDT, vote, swap the Noun, mint a new NDT, vote, and so on... wdyt?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction