app review rejected pixeldrop. i know what i’m doing this sunday

🔍 ensdata.net ✦ 🖼️ pugson.net/rfe ✦  🌐 metadata.vision ✦ 𝙽𝙾𝚆: design engineer @family ✦ 𝙿𝚁𝙴𝚅: @rainbow 🌈

/salty /fufu
•
moment recorder without border
•
QmRU7QqDBJGxwxT1CV4s66PBTEU1VtoKzpEpp2K21ztdJp

no kings. only working on impossible things.

Nope, is it counted as very bad for devs?

I'm bullish cos the amount of android users around me that get 'hacked' just because they installed malicious apps from both play store and outside play store

building Stauro ❇ frontend dev at @ensdomains ❇
prev. @rainbow, @geniexyz, @fleek

i'm speaking from end user pov in indonesia, 3rd world country from my pov as of now. gatekeeping is unpleasant, but apps for the masses are usually available on both android and apple.

i use android for public service apps, because that's the only platform my government release in, so technically indonesia gatekeep apps because android devices have lower price barrier. very often these apps that we have to download to pay our utilities are ridden with malicious codes, believe it or not, you can google, some even put miners in the app, apple don't do this type of shit.

i'll still champion apple over android any day, many people in first world country have the law to protect their 'freedom of speech' and i could go to jail for publicly shame a locally made app that has a miner in it, if the dev uses the law and there is a law specifically for that purpose.

so it's solely based on builder's honesty?

this screening process doesn't stop malicious apps. it's a questionnaire, not a security audit.

had similar thought, glad they are extra aware of face data