Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Only in the US could we be required to pay into social security, a program that has a -4% return, and people still fight for it to exist.
8 replies
4 recasts
42 reactions
Jeff Excell 🎩
@jeffexcell
My parents rely on this.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BrixBountyFarm 🎩
@brixbounty
Not going to say there aren’t problems with SS, yet I’ve always thought of it as a safety net for lower income earners. And less of social security as “my investments”. Would be happy to see cap raised further to increase the sustainability of it going forward. Could have been managed much better though.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jared 🎩
@javabu.eth
Thank you for posting in /politics 1000 $Degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chainleft
@chainleft
Or maybe it's intentionally sabotaged after decades of curtailing to result in -4% return. Because other countries are quite happy with their social security.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
littleshrimp
@littleshrimp
People fight for it to exist because they’ve been paying into it their whole lives. If the government wants to give me a lump sum of what I paid (with some interest) I’d call it even.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gen Z
@admin-gen-z
Gõy Sog, but we still need it!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Casemidio
@casemidio
we have the same in Brazil, full ponzi shit
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BabyUniverse
@babyuniverse3
Sounds good
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tmophoto
@tmophoto
What percentage of elected officials are old enough for it?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
