Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/fc-devs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Channel gating ideas People are going to get very creative.
26 replies
18 recasts
188 reactions
Andy Jagoe
@andyjagoe
any future for gated channels where casts are private at the protocol level? direct casts is one option, but has a number of ux drawbacks
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
You could build a client that encrypts cast content and decrypts it within your client.
4 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
Andy Jagoe
@andyjagoe
that’s an amazing idea maybe we’ll build this at Fairmint for founders to communicate with investors and GPs to communicate with syndicates/LPs anyone know what the most popular tools for this are today?
4 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
EulerLagrange.eth - shitpost/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
This is easier to say then it is to implement. If you need it to scale encrypting a cast for many people runs into a lot of complexity.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Dean Pierce 👨💻🌎🌍
@deanpierce.eth
I feel like a static symmetric key per channel is fine. It means you can't remove people etc, but it works fine for certain use cases. I spent a bit of time working on something like that a few months ago. https://warpcast.com/deanpierce.eth/0xc7bd00ec
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth - shitpost/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
I can easily recast everything into a different channel where it’s decrypted and no one would know who’s leaking it. I don’t know why you’d want to do that will a separate client
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dean Pierce 👨💻🌎🌍
@deanpierce.eth
How is that different from any other scheme? If you send a message to any encrypted group, someone could leak messages anonymously. If leaks become a problem, you could post a message that the channel is compromised, and rebuild with a smaller more trusted community. Ideally channel decryption would be standardized.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
