Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
entter
@entter
this feels stupid if you gonna exhibit art but you place a barrier between the art and the viewer then better just leave the artworks at the storage replyoors, wadda u think??
7 replies
4 recasts
16 reactions
p.i.x.e.l.l.a.r.e.
@pixellare
β π§‘
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
π benna ππ©
@benna
i guess there are a few things i would consider here: is the barrier an intentional part of the artwork? ie: enclosing the artist's works in a enclosed world within the exhibition space? secondly, wondering if it's just required because of insurance reasons lol so they didn't have much of a choice? there have been works in this space in the Bourse de Commerce that had no barriers at all, so this set-up feels intentional and work-specific.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ilannnnnnnnkatin
@ilannnnnnnnkatin
Probably best to not jump to conclusions with demeaning explitives. Find out what the intention was. Then make statements based on what you found. Were they trying to do this?ππΌ
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Camila π«
@camilags
Iβve been to this space twice and it was well used. One could go in and walk through the artworks. It is a very difficult space for artists I guess. But not essentially bad. Iβm not sure what they are doing now.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Isa Kostπͺ²π«π
@isakost
You made me think of the movie βthe square,β have you seen it?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Ykha Amelz
@ykha
Iβm a clumsy person so I appreciate the barrier a gallery put π€£ but maybe not like this one, itβs too far away to really see anything they put in the middle π€·π»ββοΈ
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
littlecakes
@littlecakes
i was thinking about this and thought a less fence-like barrier would have been to build a big round pedestal and place everything on top as is but maybe the bronze lookin' thing would be too heavy
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
