Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Elad
@el4d
I'm afraid of Wilson's idea. I'm also happy to be proven wrong be Wilson and other braver souls :) I worry we'll hurt the brand if: - we end up funding subpar proposals because we feel rushed and better props aren't showing up - we end up burning a lot and many ppl feel it's a giant waste
6 replies
0 recast
16 reactions
seneca
@seneca
agree and feel the same, its def risky. but - is it not the inevitable? forget the burn and lets assume the arb magically disappears, what makes us think that we’d spend more (or less) thoughtfully then? imo, the burn (or any forcing function) just gets us to the endgame faster. we will learn the truth.
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
Elad
@el4d
I want to learn faster, on that we're aligned. I fear the fast pace of spend or burn will lead to some pretty bad spending. More than ever we'll be a grift target, and more than ever the grift will work out. Much to say about this, not enough characters 😅
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Elad
@el4d
One easy thread to pull: we are not clear on our existing builders who's amazing and who isn't. When familiar names will come for more, we will default to yes more than ever before. And in the less awesome cases the outcome will be net negative.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Noun 40
@noun40
I don’t quite agree with this. this assumes instituting the burn resulting in the voters lowering voting standards but at least so far voters have been tougher in season 3 than season 2 and I have a speculate a high prop volume will drive it to be even more competitive and higher
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
