Farcaster

Just thinking out loud: is there a world where there could be one signer managed per user managed by a third party that apps could use instead of creating a signer per app? 

Have to look a bit further into this, but the thinking is that paying for a signer per app turns me off from using a lot of excellent apps

building products in web3, hacking /farhack, yapping /dylan | dylansteck.com

And having some sort of root layer app(maybe it's a protocol wallet?) where I choose what client I want to use for certain actions(to cast, to open a link, to act on the protocol etc) would be very helpful

For sure -- it would be cool to explore how this could be built as a public good or other type of credibly neutral platform that'll ensure anyone building on the protocol could use this signer management utility

That was the easy path for Warpcast but we felt it would be better for the FC ecosystem to force another company (or a few) to offer this.

onchain cost to create signer is ~$0.11

after EIP-4844 it may be ~$0.01

Everyone is free to wait for Neynar to build shared signers, Farcaster to implement Sign In With Farcaster, clients to update...

but if impatient, please try my signer faucet
+support @kenny @hellno etc

intersubjective mechanism design @ poidh.xyz - come chill /poidh + follow @poidhbot

onchain cost to create signer is ~$0.11

after EIP-4844 it may be ~$0.01

Everyone is free to wait for Neynar to build shared signers, Farcaster to implement Sign In With Farcaster, clients to update...

but if impatient, please try my signer faucet
+support @kenny @hellno.eth etc

https://warpcast.com/artlu.eth/0x617cf7ba

Sounds like a wallet - feels like an anti goal for FC. If we are managing our own wallet across different apps, at that point things become both simpler and harder depending on if you’re crypto native or not