Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
Just thinking out loud: is there a world where there could be one signer managed per user managed by a third party that apps could use instead of creating a signer per app? Have to look a bit further into this, but the thinking is that paying for a signer per app turns me off from using a lot of excellent apps
4 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
And having some sort of root layer app(maybe it's a protocol wallet?) where I choose what client I want to use for certain actions(to cast, to open a link, to act on the protocol etc) would be very helpful
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

McBain pfp
McBain
@mcbain
I I seem to remember @manan and the @neynar team had a non-protocol solution to this
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction