Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
Just thinking out loud: is there a world where there could be one signer managed per user managed by a third party that apps could use instead of creating a signer per app? Have to look a bit further into this, but the thinking is that paying for a signer per app turns me off from using a lot of excellent apps
4 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
That was the easy path for Warpcast but we felt it would be better for the FC ecosystem to force another company (or a few) to offer this.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
For sure -- it would be cool to explore how this could be built as a public good or other type of credibly neutral platform that'll ensure anyone building on the protocol could use this signer management utility
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction