Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Why don't you clean up "the bots"? Useful to be precise here: "bots" is a catch all term that people use to describe low effort, uninteresting or otherwise off-topic content. However, a "bot" is traditionally thought of as a programmatic account, i.e. controlled by a script or software. e.g. bot net When people on Farcaster refer to "bots" they are more often referring to actual people using a mobile device (with the aid of translation tools and ChatGPT) who post uninteresting content (from their pov). They are casting and replying in hopes of appearing to be a "real account" because they have learned that turns into a future economic reward in crypto. Recent tipping meta has increased the expected value of these accounts. It's possible to algorithmically label these accounts, but then you create a "shadowban" meta. So you massively increase the number of support messages and complaints. This was the state of the world before priority mode.
79 replies
62 recasts
461 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
We're going to keep iterating here, but our pov is: 1. Priority mode works pretty well out of the box 2. We need to offer ways for actual interesting accounts to break through 3. We'll likely bring back some version of spam labeling since priority mode has created it's own set of customer support complaints. "Why don't you just use onchain signals?" a. Based on our waitlist last year of 300K sign ups, "bots" have plenty of Ethereum addresses with assets. b. Most new users don't want to connect an address during sign up (friction, doesn't work well on mobile). So you'll miss out of on good accounts. c. Active onchain presence != you regularly post interesting content. There are some people of course, but plenty of examples otherwise.
30 replies
5 recasts
164 reactions
meta-david 💥| Building Scoop3
@metadavid
Thanks for addressing. Totally understand and have always been on your side of the camp on this one. I think "bots" carry a lot more nuance than what many people realize. I'm not a big fan of the shadowbanning meta, I'd rather just ignore whomever I find uninteresting than risking shadowbanning legit accounts that just might not be great at engagement. :)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Most people stop using the app if they get too many spammy replies. They don't have patience to ignore or mute.
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
AlvarLord
@amartos
I think there are more people who stop using it because they don't receive any reply when they cast than for any other factor.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shoaib
@psydeffects
Ignore or mute just solves the problem. :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
SSR
@ssr
If we get that spam hello good, done etc. To our cast did it give positive impact? For growing?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
meta-david 💥| Building Scoop3
@metadavid
I guess I'm a diehard that doesn't care, haha.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
