0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
27 replies
30 recasts
264 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
3 replies
5 recasts
96 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
I don't know how helpful it is, maybe as a small way of advertising for clients.
Also there's a technical detail here, a signer that has its PK shared, can be used by anyone, so there's no 100/100 way to technically prove from which client the cast is sent.
For example I have a signer PK which the metadata was signed by firefly, but I can use that PK in any script then it would appear as firefly.
Generally the PK might not be shared, but again it's not possible 100/100 to guarantee a cast comes from a specific signer, just that the signer key used was signed by X FID.
So I guess the actually correct phrase is "Signed by - username" instead of "Sent from - username", signed by username also makes more sense because any FID can be a signer, and that FID by have a confusing name that is not a client, something like dwr, sds, gt, or any other such username.
Also you can create a signer from the same user that will send the cast. 0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
