Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
live with Justin Kan: “I actually recant that tweet [attached]. If you don’t have a great product, you’re fucked and distribution doesn’t matter. The more accurate is second time founders care about product AND distribution but that doesn’t sound as good.” Product + distribution > product > distribution
5 replies
5 recasts
51 reactions
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
did dan or varun found a company before farcaster?
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
idk! ask @dwr.eth @v, did you guys? why are you curious or asking? :)
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Most of what I’ve seen called “growth” from dev day is really product and not at all about distribution i understand focusing on building a product that has clear differentiation/PMF but FC/WC disregards distribution to an extent that’s pretty surprising for a social product
2 replies
1 recast
6 reactions
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
ah, i see so imo Justin Kan would actually say that’s the disciplined and right approach: focus on nailing the product before you focus on distribution because “if you have a bad product, you’re fucked” seems a waste of resources to me to focus on distribution before you optimize product
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Do you think FC/WC is a bad product? My main criticism relative to distribution is that FC/WC has not made it easy to onboard people or give power users/builders the right tools to help them do that
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Our problem is retention, not onboarding. Solve retention, onboarding becomes the problem to solve.
6 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Sinaver pfp
Sinaver
@sinaver.eth
that's true, I onboarded 6 people to Warpcast and only 1 person keeps using it (
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Potential network effects are basically neutered which isn’t ideal for retention or onboarding Is retention the top priority right now?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Div pfp
Div
@div
Interesting. Was retention a problem last quarter or are you measuring it on a longer scale (from the time of degen and frame hype)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
z0z5 pfp
z0z5
@zoo
would love to see a hierarchy graphic of merkles priorities
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
whimsi pfp
whimsi
@whimsi.eth
unstructured thoughts incoming sry thought 1: have you considered the equivalent of a 'tutorial island' for new users? almost like limiting their visibility of OG casters to ones that specifically opt in, helping them from immediately hitting the spam filter thought 2: i think a lot of whether or not you stick around here is dependent on whether you managed to find your people or not (disregarding the other bits like initially feeling like you're casting out into the void etc.) power badge basically worked as an indicator of who to interact (or not interact) with, and i was thinking maybe with these new channel changes it might help to have 'new to X channel' badges for some set days (7/14/30) so that they're 'highlighted' and more of an effort may be made to help them integrate and learn?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kaiwenwang.me 🙂‍↔️ pfp
kaiwenwang.me 🙂‍↔️
@xjzisib
you can build around a topic or on people currently it’s focused on people which means people leave if no engagement
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction