Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
live with Justin Kan: “I actually recant that tweet [attached]. If you don’t have a great product, you’re fucked and distribution doesn’t matter. The more accurate is second time founders care about product AND distribution but that doesn’t sound as good.” Product + distribution > product > distribution
5 replies
2 recasts
31 reactions
Garrett
@garrett
did dan or varun found a company before farcaster?
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
idk! ask @dwr.eth @v, did you guys? why are you curious or asking? :)
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Garrett
@garrett
Most of what I’ve seen called “growth” from dev day is really product and not at all about distribution i understand focusing on building a product that has clear differentiation/PMF but FC/WC disregards distribution to an extent that’s pretty surprising for a social product
2 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
ah, i see so imo Justin Kan would actually say that’s the disciplined and right approach: focus on nailing the product before you focus on distribution because “if you have a bad product, you’re fucked” seems a waste of resources to me to focus on distribution before you optimize product
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Garrett
@garrett
Do you think FC/WC is a bad product? My main criticism relative to distribution is that FC/WC has not made it easy to onboard people or give power users/builders the right tools to help them do that
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Our problem is retention, not onboarding. Solve retention, onboarding becomes the problem to solve.
6 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
kaiwenwang.me 🙂‍↔️
@xjzisib
you can build around a topic or on people currently it’s focused on people which means people leave if no engagement
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
