Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
We're considering reducing sign up costs by 90%. Weigh in!
13 replies
5 recasts
70 reactions
Alemac pfp
Alemac
@alemac
How would this section be modified? It would cost less warps to invite a friend?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Bratovanov🪐 pfp
Bratovanov🪐
@bratovanov.eth
Why not try an approach where users can distribute a limited number of free invites, determined by their organic far score, for example? The storage can be the same as everyone else's. I’d even go further and say I’d gladly support the project with a fixed percentage of the tips I receive. As a user benefiting from the monetization opportunities you’ve created, I owe you at least that. This way, you can deduct storage funds that deplete proportionally to my activity, and I’ll also contribute to funding the project to ensure its long-term existence from which, among other things, I also have a financial interest. Most users would probably agree, as long as the deductions happen automatically.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
patxol 🔷 anser.social pfp
patxol 🔷 anser.social
@patxol.eth
That’s great for a massive influx of bots (they do not need to maintain following or casts). I do not see how that could improve retention or content quality. That’s just increasing signups, same as what marketing would do, and this is useless if there is no retention as you already stated. A good way to increase DAUs without breaking the hubs architecture though.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Eric pfp
Eric
@plante.eth
posting my reply here too. would it in way limit access to frames? if not, the App Store nature of frames could be used to generate infinite hooks for both the “free” and longer term user bases of the platform.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
JC pfp
JC
@jonathancolton
An experiment worth trying. Removing barriers/friction is always a winning move.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Ramsey 🎩🤝 pfp
Ramsey 🎩🤝
@ramsey
First time I wanted to sign up I got discouraged bcs of 5 bucks. Stupid, I know. But still, it's probably a matter of principle for a lot of people. IMO having no cost then hooking them with "quality content" and paying for storage would be better. Or at least a good experiment, if there was a way to discurage bots.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
basement5k.⌐◨-◨ 🟡 pfp
basement5k.⌐◨-◨ 🟡
@basement5k.eth
I think it’s a concept worth piloting. I think it’s fair to expect a noticeable skew in the sign ups vs active users. But removing(or basically removing) barrier may be good for folks who are on the fence
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Chinmay 🕹️🍿 pfp
Chinmay 🕹️🍿
@chinmay.eth
https://warpcast.com/chinmay.eth/0xb6e4d136
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
max ↑🎩 pfp
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
Need to make it clear with users I guess Sounds like a trial version and could show like a progress bar with remaining activity + upgrade btn
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Irina Ideas pfp
Irina Ideas
@ideas
Good idea the less barriers the better
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
pugson pfp
pugson
@pugson
worth a try for 3 months to see what happens
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Yes this is great Alongside this, I think it's important to have an easy process to upgrade your storage so that users aren't left confused if they hit storage limits. Maybe a pop up or something prompting them to pay to increase their storage or maybe even FC sponsors new users who hit storage limits as a retention/growth experiment
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
MetaEnd🎩 pfp
MetaEnd🎩
@metaend.eth
Better add a low-key free way, some follows some likes. Add some proofs worldcoin, and what else not to prevent sibil
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction