Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If an AI agent can generate top 1% supply of the atomic unit whatever your network / protocol / marketplace is optimizing for, why would you care if it was human or not? Value is is value.
42 replies
45 recasts
166 reactions

EmpiricalLagrange - tevm/acc pfp
EmpiricalLagrange - tevm/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
I think as long as it’s clear they’re an AI or human, then it doesn’t matter. For example if it turned out all the top accounts on FC were actually AI, that would completely change your view of the farcaster network, no?
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Depends what you’re optimizing for. If it’s to be entertained, why do you care? Funny is funny. Smart is smart.
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

EmpiricalLagrange - tevm/acc pfp
EmpiricalLagrange - tevm/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
In social networks, my theory is authenticity of personality is what is selected for. It’s why spelling mistakes can be a good thing. Also why I think brands are giving way to personalities (like Mr beast, Kylie Jenner, and Rogan’s alpha brain). Assuming that’s true, then we end with an interesting question…
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What’s the difference between an “authentic” human assisted by AI and a pure AI? :)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

EmpiricalLagrange - tevm/acc pfp
EmpiricalLagrange - tevm/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
I can look at this title and clearly see there’s something wrong here
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
They had to apologize because it was bad, not because it was written by AI
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction