Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Looking for people who are frustrated with the changes and new direction for channels. Last week, we got a lot of good feedback from people happy with / excited about the changes. See below. Now I want to highlight what's still not working for people. Specifically: 1. What's frustrating? 2. What would make it better? https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0xcf622e07
74 replies
144 recasts
464 reactions

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
I think we could use some guidance on what channels โ€œshould beโ€ in the future. How big is too big? How niche should we be? Should /food even exist or should that be a โ€œcategoryโ€ we can sort our channels into? I think most people are unsure what to do with their channels. This is a big cultural shift and any though leadership would be appreciated.
5 replies
5 recasts
38 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Great question! 1. I think the legacy topic channels are going to have a hard time in this model. Really requires a motivated owner / mod team. Unclear how to make something as big as /food as cohesive community. 2. I think people should think of building channels the same way they would build a community Discord server or anything else with a culture, norms, etc. 3. The goal should be to a thriving community. People making meaningful connections and relationships. It shouldn't be a place people dump content in a category for a boost.
2 replies
2 recasts
14 reactions

๐Ÿ“ฟ zach harris ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿผ pfp
๐Ÿ“ฟ zach harris ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿผ
@zachharris.eth
Why not Reddit sub thread approach? BBQ would be a sub community within /food as the topic on-ramp. Owner / mod of food could curate collections of related subcommittees. Kind of think about it like a folksonomy that loosely follows DMOZ structure. Does that approach work at all?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

sparkz  pfp
sparkz
@jacy
I don't think it's fair to assume most ppl are dumping into a channel for a boost. Sometimes I have a specific question about a place I'm visiting but am not a member so can't ask. Or I have an isolated post on /food or /music that may not be of interest to my followers but would be to those channel followers. I personally think broader interest channels shouldn't be so stingy with membership so long as you're not a bot or spamming. But I guess the bigger point is that I think the changes are resulting in less casting. I don't know what the fix is (and I'm not going to make another client ๐Ÿ˜‰)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions