Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
seneca
@seneca
convinced quote cast needs to be a thing. can’t count how many times i’ve wanted to qc something
5 replies
1 recast
23 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What does quote casting accomplish for you that replying doesn't?
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
i am more interested in sharing/curating if i can add my take to it. pure rts are spam because my followers didn’t follow other people, they followed me. replies talk to the accounts already involved in the thread, not my audience
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Recast and reply. Quote tweets fracture the conversation. Further emphasizes broadcast vs. conversation. At its worst, it’s a dunk button. Will eventually add it, but features change behavior. :)
3 replies
2 recasts
7 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Not being able to fracture the conversation can be a reason not to join it. QC allows to start a conversation with a new audience (followers, channel) and set the context, while allowing participants to find the original conversation.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
_slow_crypto 🌅⏳🪁
@slowcrypto
Knew you had a line on this and hadn’t seen you spell it out before. The simplicity of recast and reply is great.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
a1z2 💫
@a1z2
Definitely agree… I think a cool alternative/compromise would be to allow “reference” tweets as replies only. That way it’s still a conversation, and it’s not a direct cast. Users would only be allowed to “reference” other casts as replies to other people’s casts.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
